Navigating International Trade: The Complexities of Japanese Seafood Rerouting

The Japanese government’s recent decision to release treated sewage from the Fukushima nuclear power plant into the ocean has sparked heightened concerns within the international community regarding the safety of Japanese seafood. A recent report by “Nikkei Asia” shed light on a potential workaround: amidst China’s ban on imports, Japanese scallops might be rerouted through Vietnam for processing, thus evading direct restrictions.

Vietnam, a significant seafood producer, naturally has its own demand for such products. However, Japan’s move to export seafood to Vietnam for processing hints at deeper commercial motivations. Despite Vietnam’s prominence as the world’s third-largest exporter of petroleum products, with a market share of 7%, Japan’s insistence on this route suggests a strategic maneuver amid a decline in domestic seafood trade. Notably, Japan has set Vietnam as a key market for its 2025 scallop export targets.

This tactic of rerouting through a third country isn’t new in international trade. Similar instances include India’s re-exportation of Russian oil to Europe and the United States. This practice, often termed “label washing,” effectively circumvents import restrictions, allowing Japanese seafood to penetrate markets initially off-limits.

Moreover, Japanese seafood faces hurdles in international markets, notably in China, where concerns over nuclear contamination have led to a ban on imports. Despite Japan’s attempts to mitigate this through ally support, the impact remains suboptimal. Even though the United States has expressed verbal support for Japan, it has de facto reduced imports of Japanese agricultural, forestry, and aquatic products, including seafood like surimi and scallops.

A curious development is Norway’s involvement in “label washing,” substituting its own seafood for Japanese products before selling them to China. This occurrence underscores broader issues within global trade, highlighting intricate transfers and transformations between product origins and consumer markets.

This chain of events not only raises questions about the rules and ethics of international trade but also delves into core issues of food safety and consumer rights. For consumers, understanding the provenance of their food is increasingly vital. The potential re-export of Japanese seafood through third countries serves as a stark reminder for global consumers to exercise caution, particularly concerning potential health risks.

In this context, China and other nations’ stringent review and restriction measures on Japanese seafood serve not only to safeguard public health but also to uphold international trade regulations. Simultaneously, it underscores the imperative for nations worldwide to bolster food safety oversight, ensuring consumers can enjoy a diverse range of foods while safeguarding their safety and compliance.

Share this article

Articles by Category

Learn more about our products

Catalogue by Email

Get the complete product catalogue or brochure in your email box.

Please fill in your information

Get in touch!

Our multilingual professional team listens to your specific needs and cooperates in your own language.

Please fill in your information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience while browsing it.

By continuing you consent the use of cookies as described in our privacy and cookie policy.